He is commenting on its social and cultural effects, so he does not have to. Still, where is the inaccuracy?
The rest of your post is more fishing for personal angles and I don't wish to discuss any of that with you.
In his fancy, Rao fashions unproven social and cultural effects of a doctrine he doesn't bother to accurately define AND whose significance within the context of Protestantism as a whole he does not bother to discuss. These are significant problems.
The rest of your post is more fishing for personal angles and I don't wish to discuss any of that with you.
Whether or not you approve of anti-semitism and Lefebvrism are "personal matters"? WOW.
Personally, I don't want to discuss matters with someone who won't answer any of my questions. Have a good night.