Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex

“Let’s discuss the article.”

There is nothing to discuss. It is simply a long, pseudo-intellectual opinion piece, ungrounded in anything. References to Scripture: 0. I would offer a far more harshly accurate assessment of it, but I do try to follow the guidelines as delineated.

Besides, it was, as I said, meant to provoke.


154 posted on 02/23/2010 9:43:53 PM PST by Belteshazzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Belteshazzar

The point of the article is proper Christian anthropology and the cultural damage done by the doctrine of the total depravity of man. By their fruits we know them. Do you yourself support the T in the damn tulip or what? The article may not give scriptural references — it is not that kind of an arcticle. Do you have a scriptural rebuttal? Or any other kind?


155 posted on 02/23/2010 9:56:06 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson