Seriously? But you will still use whatever portion of scripture of the Old and New Testament, when convenient?
Well, how convenient.
Aren’t you really invalidating your claim to the Bible, in any way, as it is so flawed. As such, how can it be trusted for it’s integrity.
Said integrity, is a perspective of subjective view and a foundation of baked bread which can easily be eaten by the birds or washed away in the tide.
What is your point? Really? Your answer is important as it is for posterity, so be sincere and introspect.
Sorry for the last paragraph, they are incongruent with your values, which shift like dunes in the Sahara.
Don’t mean to be so rough, but you really can’t have it both ways and still continue proudly claim your Christian-Lite Heritage.
Don’t mean to be so rough...
No problem your original persona has worn off by now...
BTW you are on an ecumenical thread might read up on it!
Most of the words in the article are of a Prof Tov
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2457262/posts?page=11#11