Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xone

Then what your saying is Luther had his own opinions. And that is all they are. Luther had no authority.

If Luther had no authority, why bother listening to anything he said? I wouldn’t waste my time if that was the case.

I have to go pick up a pizza. But here’s a bit from wikipedia and Martin Luther:

Martin Luther believed that Mary did not have other children, and did not have any marital relations with Joseph,[25] maintaining, that the brothers mentioned were cousins.[26] This is consistent with his lifelong acceptance of the idea of the perpetual virginity of Mary.

So, was Luther wrong or right? And what else was he wrong or right about?


62 posted on 02/20/2010 1:42:17 PM PST by Cap'n Crunch (Rush Limbaugh, the Winston Churchill of our time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Cap'n Crunch
Then what your saying is Luther had his own opinions. And that is all they are. Luther had no authority.

God's Word was Luther's authority.

wikipedia

lcms.org

64 posted on 02/20/2010 1:46:04 PM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: Cap'n Crunch

Martin Luther was just a man. He did not author scripture. Men can follow God and be in error. Popes are perfect examples of that.

I know you think you have a gotcha moment here, but please don’t let this distract you from presenting scripture to back your arguments.

I’m still waiting for you to show me a single verse or people praying to the deceased.


65 posted on 02/20/2010 1:47:41 PM PST by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson