Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD
"Now given that the author takes great pains in likening Mary to "an Ark", and that she served as a "dwelling place" for our Lord, how is this not a violation of the Canon? "

I rest assured that Tim Sataples is not teaching heresy.

The Lord recieved his flesh from the Blessed Virgin Mary I don't see the problem of her also being called an ark.

"but shall pretend that it belongs to another person who is united to him [i.e., the Word] only according to honour, and who has served as a dwelling for the divinity;"

They are condemning the idea that the Lord's flesh was not his own but merely a dwelling place of the Word.

86 posted on 02/15/2010 9:23:16 PM PST by GonzoII (www.fultonsheen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: GonzoII
I rest assured that Tim Sataples is not teaching heresy.

Well, that's comforting to know. :O)

They are condemning the idea that the Lord's flesh was not his own but merely a dwelling place of the Word.

I understand your point. However, I believe there are variations to what is being said here. Too bad the council isn't logged on so we could ask them.

157 posted on 02/16/2010 5:23:03 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson