[Belteshazzar]

OK. Let’s assume for a moment that you have a point, that there is a difference between “to be in agreement” and “to not be in contradiction” (which exact language I recall using since that is the usual language of the meaning of the imprimatur).

So instruct us all, first, as to the meaning of the imprimatur, and then, second, as to how “not to be in contradiction” invalidates the point made by Quix regarding the authority and role of Mary in the salvation of man ... his point being that the book in question ascribes to Mary far more than her being the Theotokos, with which I have no argument, because it is both scriptural and recognized as such by the fathers of the earlier, and purer, church.

Demonstrate that your position is different than that of the little boy, caught by his mother with crumbs on his lips, who will not admit to any wrong doing until his mother, having carefully inventoried the now diminished contents of the cookie jar, asks precisely: “Jimmy, did you eat 4 and 1/2 chocolate chip cookies and two peanut butter ones?”

[editor-surveyor]

By now you must know from experience that he doesn’t do specific answers.

[Petronski]

Demonstrate that your position is different than that of the little boy, caught by his mother with crumbs on his lips, who will not admit to any wrong doing until his mother, having carefully inventoried the now diminished contents of the cookie jar, asks precisely: “Jimmy, did you eat 4 and 1/2 chocolate chip cookies and two peanut butter ones?”

How about you demonstrate how to go pound sand.

[Quix]

PING Precious Bro & Sisters.

A splendid mind and spirit is newly contending for the faith on this thread with great accuracy, anointing and discernment as well as wonderful prose.

BLESSED BE THE NAME OF THE LORD!