Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: patriot preacher

But the ceremony is germane here.

Consider this. Subjectively, there may not have been disrespect: the woman seems to be sorry and it is possible that she misunderstood. There as an act of material disrespect, but possibly no intention to disrespect.

This is where the ceremonial part begins to matter. With Communion in the hand the action signifies taking and carrying the Host away. The act of eating is separated from the carrying away. What traditionally, with receiving on the tongue, was virtually impossible to get wrong, now requires teaching.


28 posted on 02/12/2010 7:06:50 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

What traditionally, with receiving on the tongue, was virtually impossible to get wrong, now requires teaching.
______________________

But didn’t the Lord Himself instruct the Church to “make disciples,” not just consumers [so to speak]?


29 posted on 02/12/2010 9:16:54 PM PST by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson