You’re ill-informed post regarding CC speaks volumes of you though.
But I won’t stoop to calling you a “liar”.
Attack the messenger, not the message.
Marginalize the messenger by calling them a “hater”, put them on the defensive, get them off the topic and into the mode of having to defend themselves instead of being able to get their message out.
The play book.
Summarized Mormon apologetic strategies as follows:
• Deny - until the facts overwhelm.
• Attack - the sources, the critic, anything to change the subject of
discussion.
• Use the “Personal Defence” – A clever variation on “Attack” which
shifts the focus to the hard-done-by apologist and away from the
substance of the debate. The apologist might all but make up an
attack against himself, for example, and use attack language toward
himself, as if the critic had said it, and then shift into a Personal
Defence.
• Accept and Reject - essentially the “so what” defence, regardless of
the merit of the evidence rejected.
• Assert Victory - this includes “victory” over the factual information that
was never reasonably refuted.
• Refuse Re-engagement - once victory is declared, continued debate
can be declared irrelevant.
• Emphasize Feelings – bear testimony based on feelings. This shifts the
argument out of the objective into the subjective. Facts become
relative to perspective. There can be no rational argument on this
basis.