Yes I did enjoy your writings. Have your read much about the Transcental Argument for God. It essentially states: The proof of the existence is proven by the impossibility of the contrary argument. The transendental proof for God's existence is that without Him it is impossible to prove anything. The materialist, atheist veiw is irrational and cannot consistently provide the preconditions of intelligible experience, science, logic or morality. The materialist, atheists worldview cannot allow for the laws of logic, the uniformity of nature, the ability of the mind to understand the world, and moral absolutes. In that sense the atheist cannot acount for Truth and knowlege (warranted true belief).
Isn't it ironic that those atheists who proclaim themselves arbitors or truth and science must borrow from the Theistic Christian Worldview to make such a statement.
Have your read much about the Transcental Argument for God. It essentially states: The proof of the existence is proven by the impossibility of the contrary argument. The transendental proof for God's existence is that without Him it is impossible to prove anything. Yes, I'm acquainted with that argument.
Isn't it ironic that those atheists who proclaim themselves arbitors or truth and science must borrow from the Theistic Christian Worldview to make such a statement.
Yes, is is ironic. But atheists won't admit what they do, much less what they believe from what is seen. I've had conversations with some atheists, and it's an almost impossible task to present the Good News of Christ - they always seem to have a materialisic view of what is truth.