[Uri’el-2012]

U-2912>Would Rabbi Paul have taught the Babylonian Paganism of Nicea ? To refer to the Nicean Creed as paganism is an affront to the Word of God and to the millions of Christians who believe it. Saul of Tarsus, who later became known as Paul, was never a Rabbi. His only role was to spread and add clarity to the Gospel of Christ; that Christ completed the Covenants of the Old Testament. He did not legitimately add anything new.

Are you completely ignorant
of the fact that Saul(Paul) was a student of Gamaliel ?

Yah'shua fulfilled the "Law" in order to be the sinless Lamb of G-d.

To believe that Yah'shua did away with the Law
suggests that He was not YHvH.

Yah'shua rebuked the Pharisees who created traditions
which impugned His Holy Word.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

[Natural Law]

"Are you completely ignorant..."

One of us is and it ain't me. Everything good in Paul's writings is not new and everything new in Paul's writings is not good. Paul was not a Pharisee and actually demonstrated a very imperfect understanding of rabbinical Judaism, which was a much livelier and more humane affair than he made out. He was, by his own admission, an agent of the Sadducee High Priest, who was a Roman collaborator loathed by the Jewish population. I do not question his faith after his conversion, but I cannot accept a distortion of who he was prior to it.