Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLib
No, He tells them that none of them shall have authority over the others in very plain and simple language.

Yet it is equally plain to me that he is talking about the proper exercise of authority and not a denial that one can exercise such authority. I notice that you did not address the fact in in Mark our Lord affirms that someone will indeed sit at his right and his left. As for your attempt to conflate the keys with the power to bind and loose, we will just have to disagree.

8 posted on 01/26/2010 8:55:00 PM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Petrosius; FormerLib
[P to FL] As for your attempt to conflate the keys with the power to bind and loose, we will just have to disagree

The keys are directly related to the power to bind and loosen, and that is granted to all his disciples, not just Peter. And it is clear that it takes at least two, not one, to get anything "approved" by God (notice it's not the Son, but the Father — again suboridnaitonalist).

So, no, he definitely did not appoint Peter alone as the sole authority in the Church. It takes at least two of any of the twelve.

11 posted on 01/27/2010 8:53:37 AM PST by kosta50 (Don't look up -- the truth is all around you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson