Skip to comments.
Theological Q&A: What principles of interpretation are necessary to study the bible?
CPRF ^
| Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
Posted on 01/08/2010 9:41:32 AM PST by Gamecock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: Mr Rogers
If I understanding you correctly, you are saying we need an infallible way to interpret scripture for Sola Scriptura to be true. Is that correct? No, not at all. I'm saying that for Sola Scriptura to be true, Scripture would have to be self-evident: no interpretation required. But since it's not....
21
posted on
01/08/2010 8:32:16 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: Enought
Care to expund on that or do you just want to hurl insults?
< crickets>
22
posted on
01/09/2010 1:05:47 AM PST
by
Gamecock
(We always have reasons for doing what we do.)
To: r9etb
But when you get down to it, the Sola Scriptura doctrine has a rather uneasy relationship with the Holy Spirit. And what I've seen of Reformed theology reflects that uneasiness. Your argument is a nonstarter. Previous installments clearly teach that it is the Holy Spirit working in the believer that allows us to understand Scripture.
23
posted on
01/09/2010 1:11:37 AM PST
by
Gamecock
(We always have reasons for doing what we do.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson