I didn't coin the term.
It's still appropriate. :)
Yes it is.
But the point is, this militant "gaystapo," which is so militant in the West against chr*stians, doesn't care a fig about the "oppression" of homosexuals in Communist/Third World regimes. They merely use "gay rights" as a club against the West, probably with the knowledge that in the coming "utopia" they will be liquidated, which makes them all the more despicable.
That's why I thought Gyastapo was an appropriate term. Typically, they want tolerance but themselves are anything but tolerant.