Your response is both insolent and inaccurate, and also shows a superficial reading of my posts, and manifests another example of the Scripturally deficient state of Roman apologetics, and a superficiality and deception which is consistent with being led and promoted by men over God, more of which should not be encouraged here.
To the contrary, my apologetics training is strictly Protestant. You, however, are unused to being beaten with your own cudgel. Neither are you prepared to carry on any serious debate with someone who does not share your extensive presuppositions.
Do you have any response to my Luke 2:29 question or are you content to answer with Pharisaical outrage?