I agree, there are inaccuracies with information on this post, and it should be removed to protect all those involved. Discussion can occur when the issue is resolved in a private manner. For anyone wishing for more accurate info, please refer to insidehighered.com. follow this link: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/11/30/vincent
Thank you for posting the Higher Ed article. TO EVERYONE ON THIS THREAD - Please urge the moderator to remove the article.
The Signatura looks with displeasure in being mentioned in any public way because being so mentioned impedes its effectiveness as ultimate official tribunal of appeal in the Church and impedes any work it may do behind the scenes to assure the correct administration of justice at lower level Church tribunals. This story’s being adverted to, commented on, circulated, posted could hurt Fr Mark’s canon lawyers and Fr Mark’s canonical case. CNA SHOULD NOT have mentioned the Signatura. It should know better.