[Heliand]

Ah, but I didn't say quoting, I said using.

This is getting towards Clintonian definitions of "is".

I "used" them by "quoting" them in large excerpts.

since you are the one claiming it contradicts No, I'm not.

Contradicts was your word. See #720: "you are using them to contradict the Catechism".

You are claiming that "using" say, the Summa, by simply providing a large excerpt, "contradicts" the Catechism.

[Petronski]

This is getting towards Clintonian definitions of "is".

My protest of your misrepresentation of my words is Clintonian?

You give Clinton far too much credit.

You are claiming that "using" say, the Summa, by simply providing a large excerpt, "contradicts" the Catechism.

I am not claiming that because "simply providing a large excerpt" is not what you did.

[Petronski]

Contradicts was your word. See #720: "you are using them to contradict the Catechism".

You're not very precise, are you? I did not say the Summa contradicts the Catechism, I said "you are using them to contradict the Catechism."