Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wmfights
The RCC had no prior history of being at the forefront of individual liberty.

The concept and development of individual liberty was a whole lot more complex than "Catholics nay, Protestants yea". It has roots in Protestant ideas, and Catholic ideas, and causes some trouble with traditional ideas in both camps. There's a reason why many of the Founding Fathers weren't very orthodox Christians.

England at the height of the Reformation -- whether under Mary, Elizabeth, or James -- was not a very free country.

501 posted on 12/09/2009 6:41:01 AM PST by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed Imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies ]


To: Campion
The concept and development of individual liberty was a whole lot more complex than "Catholics nay, Protestants yea".

Never said it wasn't. The point that doesn't get made enough is there was a basis for fearing the RC's and the RCC. If RC posters want to start with the "everybody is picking on me" nonsense then we should look at why there was a fear.

557 posted on 12/09/2009 9:43:27 AM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson