Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
The weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort must be taken to avoid killing civilians. The deaths of civilians are justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target.

So an 18-year-old draftee is a legitimate target, but the civilian leadership which ordered him to fight is not?

202 posted on 12/06/2009 7:16:59 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Arguably civilian leadership can be seen as combatants, but the general usages of modern warfare prohibit deliberate targeting of civilian leadership.

In this case the 18 year old Japanese soldier or sailor was a correct target, their aged grandparents and infant siblings were not.


204 posted on 12/06/2009 7:22:33 AM PST by narses ('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson