We have folks telling us Islam is a bigger threat than the LDS, which in this world and in this time it is by a long shot. In the eternal realm, both being false religions engineered by the Evil One to lead men astray they are on par with each other.
Then we have very earnest and in some ways right minded folk castigating others about choosing a person based on their religion, correctly quoting that there should be no official "litmus test" for higher office.
Many of those who are the very ones pointing out the former are also ones doing the later.
Which then leads me to wonder what happens if we bring both trains of thought together with this one simple question
Would you elect a devout Muslim to the POTUS?
Well in our Romney discussions of 2 years ago, this actually was our approach. But we've moved away from that. And I think we could actually avoid a lot of senseless typing & needless head-banging, if we Inmans simply agreed to just repeatedly bring up that question.
Assignment to any Inman who desires it: Track this thread & recent ones, & then, ask away on that Q.
(Seems to me we could hear the crickets already)