[Godzilla]

You are assuming (1) that Peter actually wrote that, (2) that it is divinely inspired and infallible, and (3) that it is true.

And you are assuming that (1) Peter didn't write it (2) it is not inspired and infallable and (3) it is false.

[kosta50]

And you are assuming that (1) Peter didn't write it (2) it is not inspired and infallable and (3) it is false

I am not making any claims. You are. The burden of proof is on you, not me. If you are going to present something as "evidence," I have every right to expect some proof that the evidence you present is credible. So far all I see are presumptions. In that case, we can earnestly discuss pink unicorns on Jupiter, shall we?