Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wendy1946

I don’t see any connection whatsoever between my question and your “answer”. “Ba” and “Ka” refer to noncorporeal entities (”soul”). In Jesus’ case the body was definitely physical, not ethereal. So I ask again, how would the Romans have caught, held, and re-cruficied a body that could simply disappear out of their hands and appear elsewhere???


40 posted on 11/12/2009 3:25:52 AM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
So I ask again, how would the Romans have caught, held, and re-cruficied a body that could simply disappear out of their hands and appear elsewhere???

Better question: How could a body which could simply disappear out of their hands and appear elsewhere be corporeal? The basic answer is that it wasn't, even though the experience was sufficiently real.

43 posted on 11/12/2009 7:17:42 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson