Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: TheThirdRuffian

But this only confirms the problem of the innovative views. That it was not a surprise that someone could come up with them somehow by discovering them in scripture. Considered and overwhelmingly rejected.

“Over veneration” is an odd term. If it means that Mary is God it’s latria and no longer veneration. This would be a grave error of Catholic theology and practice.

The problem from the Protestant view often arises IMHO from a form of dualism almost gnostic, all flesh is evil, total depravity, etc. In their eyes *any* veneration is wrong. It would be hard to please this view with any *less* veneration.


267 posted on 11/04/2009 11:27:04 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr

““Over veneration” is an odd term.”

I concur. I made it up because I lack the vocabulary to express the sliding scale from “blessed” to “worshipped”

“This would be a grave error of Catholic theology and practice.”

I agree. It is also a fact that this error is a widespread, if not dominant theme in certain parts of the RCC. Go watch the parade of the Virgin of Guadelupe on TV one day. Jesus is a bit player in pagan Virgin goddess worship.

I advise, from the outside, the correct RC response is to not be defensive about this error, but to admit heretical groups are doing it and stamp them out.

“all flesh is evil, total depravity”

Not any Protestant Church I know about. Well, maybe the Episcopals a/k/a the Frozen Chosen.


268 posted on 11/04/2009 12:52:05 PM PST by TheThirdRuffian (Nothing to see here. Move along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson