Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cardinal Levada: no “celibacy issue” in reception of Anglicans into Catholic Church
cna ^ | October 31, 2009

Posted on 10/31/2009 1:37:08 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: irishjuggler
I thought there'd be some "incoming". I was actually being somewhat tongue-in-cheek. I too, remember when Levada was Archbishop of San Francisco. I think we were all shocked when the Pope called him to the CDF.

Then again, Matthew was a tax collector, Mary Magdalen was a prostitute and Peter denied Jesus three times.

I'm hoping Levada does good and want to see him succeed! Hence the cheerleading.....

21 posted on 10/31/2009 7:39:53 PM PDT by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
The media have one-track minds, and they think everyone else is as obsessed with untrammelled sexual activity as they are

Again, every day there is a different story. That's all I meant.

22 posted on 10/31/2009 11:37:52 PM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Soap operas are developing stories too, Vlad. :)


23 posted on 10/31/2009 11:38:30 PM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
I didn’t see that as a scandal.

And your opinion represents the Magisterium?

24 posted on 11/01/2009 3:22:59 AM PST by NYer ( "One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone"- Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

THe downside of subsidiarity: If the higher ups won’t do it, then it’s up to us grunts. Let’s go kick some liberal butt! (Easy for me to say from 3k miles away.)


25 posted on 11/01/2009 4:37:39 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin: pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

True. But they’re written out ahead of time. This is developing organically and effects so many people. That’s why so many of us find its new developments interesting.


26 posted on 11/01/2009 4:40:50 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NYer

You wrote:

“And your opinion represents the Magisterium?”

Well, the universal Church didn’t suffer much with that last divorced priest. I have a friend, who was divorced, and his bishop wants to ordain him - even though he’s remarried. It’s already been approved by Rome. And no, I do not know all the circumstances of his first marriage, but the bishop seems to see no scandal there. I ain’t losing sleep over this. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_n31_v31/ai_17005915/


27 posted on 11/01/2009 4:46:01 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
How can a decision be made before the canonical legalities have been worked out? And if all the legalities have been worked out, why all the speculations and drama?
28 posted on 11/01/2009 8:31:58 AM PST by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

You wrote:

“How can a decision be made before the canonical legalities have been worked out?”

It is the soap operas that are written out ahead of time. You apparently misunderstood what I was saying.

“And if all the legalities have been worked out, why all the speculations and drama?”

Again, you apparently misunderstood what I was saying.


29 posted on 11/01/2009 10:07:28 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Again, you apparently misunderstood what I was saying

My apologies.

30 posted on 11/01/2009 10:11:00 AM PST by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Wouldn’t it only be an “official” scandal if he “remarried”? If your wife leaves you, it’s going to cause a stir, but it doesn’t rise, IMHO, to the level of scandal.


31 posted on 11/01/2009 10:38:36 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin: pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

No problem!


32 posted on 11/01/2009 11:13:15 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
Wouldn’t it only be an “official” scandal if he “remarried”?

Official scandal? Lol! A priest confects the Eucharist. He changes the matter of bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ. His hands were consecrated at the time of his ordination. Think about that, rather than measuring it against the contemporary trends of society.

33 posted on 11/01/2009 3:03:50 PM PST by NYer ( "One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone"- Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Don't yell at me. I'll cry!

I know all that. If somebody;s wife ups and leaves him, well, it might bear looking into, but it MIGHT be nothing to do with him, qua him. Even if one exercises great judgment at the time of marriage, people change and not everyone thinks what we think about matrimony - especially if they're Episcopalians.

I mean, I certainly that priest is out of the marriage market, and I always said in the old days if I were in charge the priest would be relieved of pastoral responsibility for some time, and the causes would have to be examined.

IS it your thought a priest ought to have an unimpeachable in any respect whatsoever marriage? Bot all of that is under his control, but it IS a great argument for celibacy.

34 posted on 11/01/2009 5:27:09 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin: pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg; NYer

An interesting thing in my diocese: we have a priest who was married, then divorced and annulled, and then became a priest (a late vocation). I had no idea that was allowed and had never heard of it before.


35 posted on 11/01/2009 5:36:05 PM PST by PatriotGirl827 (Pray for the United States of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PatriotGirl827

In my former diocese, the bishop (who was the #3 ranking bishop in the church in terms of date of consecration) divorced his wife of three decades, annulled his own marriage, then remarried a divorced woman on Palm Sunday and honeymooned out of the US on Easter Sunday. So much for his “headship” of the diocese and for his flock and for the teraching of Holy Scripture. I left the Episcopal Church shortly thereafter.


36 posted on 11/01/2009 9:35:51 PM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: miele man
, annulled his own marriage,

It's great being Bishop!

And Senator and Mrs. Elizabeth Taylor were married by the then Bishop of the Pepsicola Diocese of Virginia. I believe that was marriage number Seven for Ms. Violet Eyes to Die For.

Sacrament, schmacrament!

The River Tiber is deep and cold
The Green Gather Hymnal chills the soul.
But Sacraments burn with sacred fire,
Giving us each our heart's desire.
Alleluia.
(To the Tune of "Michael Row the Boat Ashore.)

37 posted on 11/02/2009 6:07:57 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin: pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

I’m familiar with Father William Shields. However, he’s not the only divorced Catholic priest. Also, there are divorced men who were ordained priests after getting annulments. Just like widowers can be ordained priests, the church under certain conditions allows men who are divorced to be ordained if the marriage was annulled. However, he can not be ordained if the annulment was granted due to his immaturity.


38 posted on 11/02/2009 9:14:44 AM PST by Revenge of Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

I forgot to mention the bishop also had five children. What does the annulment make them?


39 posted on 11/02/2009 10:56:31 AM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: miele man
I'm pretty sure the Episcopal canons specifically state that the status of children of an annulled marriage is not in any way affected by the annulment. It's been a while in the world since the civil status of a marriage was determined by the sacramental status thereof.

It's the same among us RCs. An annulment does not make the children bastards. It does make the parents fornicators, though clearly not usually with, uh, malice aforethought.

40 posted on 11/02/2009 1:02:01 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin: pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson