Replies

It is interesting that the very people who scream about tolerance and inclusiveness are the least tolerant and inclusive of anyone who is not like them. For Dawkins it is not just enough that he doesn't believe in God; he must assail anyone who does; he finds no room in his liberal heart to include and tolerate those who do.

It never amazes me to watch MSNBC's Rachel Maddow bemoan poor late-term abortion doctors as 'victims' of anti abortion activists and never even entertain the though of having any compassion for the murdered late umborn, who are butchered into pieces like stew meat by these "doctors," or that these "doctors" might be nothing short of Mengele type murders.

Show me one religion that hasn't evolved over time, that hasn't changed its mind on some issues. Why assail only the Catholic Chyurch and not all of them? How come there is no stoning of adulterers in Israel? Or slavery? Or polygamy? It's all in the Old Testament. So, should we now mock Judaism for changing its mind on these issues? Oh, the JDL would be out there accusing someone of anti-Semitism and hate-speech.

Rabid feminist halfwits for example have no problems with discriminatory laws such as the Draft Law because in the case of a declared war, only men get drafted. But if it were the other way around they would be screaming their heads off.

They don't mind when young men are charged more for car insurance then young women, but they complain that older women, who use their health benefits more than men, get charged more for medical insurance.

It is the ultimate hypocricy for intolerant liberals and angry feminists to complain about sexism, and intolerance.