No.
I’m NOT talking about agreement.
I’m talking about word meanings being congruently transmitted and more or less received as transmitted and responded to with more or less conventional dictionary meanings to the same or similar words.
It seems like when one sends a message out to you . . . about half of it is
1. not received by you
or
2. so mangled and distorted in your reply that even if it was received accurately, major chunks of the reply have nothing to do with the original message sent.
I’ve jousted with the best of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. I warned the Chairman of the Missions committee he’d better get his act straightened up with The Lord and with his mission team or God would . . . [deal with him strongly] within 40 DAYS, God had done exactly that. I assure you, the rest of the committee paid much better attention after that.
You will either choose to communicate sensibly and meaningfully, redemptively, constructively [NOT talking about agreement at all] . . . or you won’t. I won’t hold my breath.
I did, I am, and I will communicate in the indicated fashion. If I ignore some of your stuff it is because it is fluff, tiresomely repetitious diatribe, or otherwise inconsequential to my belief system.
The Wisconsin Synod are not the ones to whom I directed you. I have rejected their dogma myself. I would require irrefutable proof of your victory with them, as well as documentation of the topic and hopefully even transcripts of the proceedings just to believe you on this one. Did I communicate, or waffle on this one?
I absolutely do not believe this.