There will have to be a certain amount. There are some things that we say in the Anglican Use liturgy that are clangingly out of place and thus I can tell that they had to be put in because of Rome. One is where we say “Pray Brethren that our sacrifice may be acceptable to the Lord Our God” and we respond “May the Lord accept this sacrifice at your hand, for the praise and glory of His Name, for our good and the good of all his church.” Also, at the consecration where they say “This is my blood, the blood of the new and unending covenant. It shall be shed for you and for many so that sins may be forgiven.”
So you think the TAC will get a separate Rite so that the geographical sovereign, the Archbishop will not have authority over them? What about the AMIA? You don’t think this constitution is meant to be applied to many constituencies RIGHT NOW? You think it’s just about the TAC? I doubt it.
Not just, but primarily. I'm not very familiar with AMIA - are they solid male only priesthood? Plus they're pretty tiny relative to TAC aren't they? I haven't heard them chime in on the married bishop issue either - every TAC bishop said that if married bishops was a stumbling block (which they knew it was) they would step down rather than give up. That's why these Personal Ordinariates can be led by a priest. - so the married bishops will still be running them - in concert with the local Ordinary, I believe I read.