Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Wrong.

My FRiend, I backed up all the way in the conversation. You have continually tried to deflect the issue. Your taking off on what I said about the end of the temple and OT sacrificial system was another twist in the road. Just be honest.

77 posted on 10/20/2009 5:46:55 PM PDT by topcat54 ("Don't whine to me. It's all Darby's fault.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: topcat54
Wrong again. Our discussion of sacrifice was a result of your adding the words “all time.” I called you on it in #47. That was based on your allusion to Daniel 9 about the destruction of the Temple and the end of sacrifice. (Which you called said would be for all time, something that is not in that text.)

Type is probably an ok word. The OT sacrifice was effectual only as much as it signified the sacrifice of the Lamb of God. It looked forward to the true sacrifice.

That does not preclude any other sacrifice from being offered now or in the future, illegitimate or legitimate.

Will there be a legitimate sacrificial system in the future that looks back at Calvary rather than looking forward to it? It could be. I don't see anything that is necessarily opposed to it.

82 posted on 10/20/2009 6:12:53 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson