Actually, you added the "all time" part to the scripture. Isn't it funny how our interpretations can impose themselves onto scripture until we begin to think they are scripture. Even though they aren't.
While you may have, I never had just one verse in mind for connecting the temple and sacrifices ending. Neither you nor I mentioned Daniel. Your claim is listed above. Note the lack of any reference to Daniel on your part.
So, I take you to Hebrews where it is plainly taught about the end of sacrifice once for all time at Christ’s coming, and you are complaining. Perhaps you misinterpreted my reference as meaning “Old Testament” when all I said was “Bible,” as in “This is over and against His prescriptive will, that which is plainly given to us in the Bible.”
Perhaps just trying to divert the subject away from the facts.
So, let’s cut to the chase, do you sincerely believe from all the Bible teaches that animal sacrifices for the atonement of sin pleasing to God will be reinstituted in the future?
Quit playing games, TC.
The issue isn’t what I think. The issue is what scripture actually says.
And in saying that there is no more sacrifice for sins, that means that an attempted “sin atoning sacrifice”, which never existed, will also not exist in the future.
That is NOT the same as saying that sacrifices will not be made. (Perhaps by Jews in a rebuilt Temple.)
The actual language leaves open the possibility.