Then, in light of your argument and naysaying, and in reference to what I know and have witnessed along with many others, your research, IMO, has definitely been in a very limited capacity.
And I find reporters such as yourself and Quix exhibiting odd and unstable communication skills.
What you may 'find' as opposed to reality is strictly limited to your own capacity to understand, process and analyze info on this subject, which is directly related to your own personal hangups on the matter.
If you can understand this, then you can understand my lack of credence in the claims.
Personally I don't understand some people's thinking, and thusly, the human mind at times. Some can be so arrogant in their thinking, that no other form of life could possibly exist in all this vast and endless universe after universe of space. How small-minded some can be. Maybe it's by choice, you know, that 'safe-zone' I mentioned before. You may eventually be in the group of jaw-dropping, heart attack induced, maybe suicidal cases when you unpreparedly learn the truth. Hopefully you'll come out of the fog before then. :>)
Thank you for your courteous response.
I’m old, I’ve been through many books and many phases of belief and research in alien life, etc. going way back.
It’s not arrogance about being unique or close mindedness, it’s simple logic and evidence that result in my current view.
There may well be other intelligent (or non-intelligent) life in the universe. Although I believe the Drake Equation has obvious flaws, the universe is a vast place.
The gap in logic for me is between the grand claims of alien visitation and a corresponding lack of hard evidence that should exist given those claims. The common grand conspiracy theory to explain this lack also is quite unbelievable.
Thanks again for your reply.