it is exactly this type of history that ISNT BEING TAUGHT ANYWHERE, and oddly enough, when you read it, you see NOTHING OF ANY TYPE OF ‘REFORMATION’ THEOLOGY....
am i the only one who sees this?
these and other types of catholic threads inherently bring out the little protestants from whatever version of their local “Church of Jesus, The Bible Alone and ME”, claiming they have all they need in that bible and well, frankly, why that silly pesky church history that shows NADA, ZIP, ZILCH of any of their theology, cant be trusted, etc...
how these modern protestants with their modern bibles can claim a better knowledge of scripture and the church as opposed to the church fathers and CATHOLIC SUCCESSORS TO THE APOSTLES, APPOINTED BY THE APOSTLES THEMSELVES,who actually walked and talked with the apostles.....
is it just me?
bueller? bueller?