Your particular judgment is going to be a real hoot, for the audience.
I gather some folks are in for some startling surprises on that score.
But that’s got to be a grant example of rule violation.
It’s always fascinating . . .
as a psychologist and sociologist . . .
to observe folks who’s identity is so ENMESHED . . . to use a technical term . . .
soooooooooooooooo ENMESHED with an organization . . .
as to be INCAPABLE of distinguishing between
their person-hood and the organization . . .
between SAME vs DIFFERENT
between me vs other
between group vs me
between an insitution vs its members
between the garden and a single rose
between a symphony and a single note
My experience would suggest that folks who have a significant degree of ATTACHMENT problems the first 6-8 years of life . . . grow up with such serious self-worth, insecurity etc. deficits that this
ENMESHMENT—OVERWHELMING IDENTIFICATION with the INSTITUTION, GROUP such that there’s no clear BOUNDARIES where the INSTITUTIION starts and stops and the individual begins. It’s all an intensely emotionally construed amorphous mass. The Individual is lost in the group in very telling and emphatic ways and degrees.
Sometimes I think the RELIGIOUS rulers 2000 years ago had a bad dose of the same or a similar problem. Their arrogance presumed that THEY WERE THE GROUP—or, at least, such an important part of it that further distinctions were unimportant. Cheek to the max, for sure.
It’s kind of a sort of confabulation.
Seems to me they ought to develop a diagnostic category for that.
Disagreeing with Quix is a sign of mental illness, donchaknow.