Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican Backs Obama's Global Agenda
ChristianWorldviewNetwork.com ^ | October 13, 2009 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 10/13/2009 12:56:05 PM PDT by editor-surveyor

Liberal and conservative Catholics alike would prefer not to discuss how the Catholic Church, here and abroad, functions like a liberal/left-wing political lobby.

Some pro-life Catholics are acting shocked that the Vatican warmly greeted the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to President Obama, who is pro-abortion. They don't seem to understand that the Vatican and Obama agree on most major international issues.

This is the untold story-how Obama and the Vatican accept major ingredients of what has been called a New World Order.

Another untold story is how, despite a disagreement over abortion, the U.S. Catholic Bishops and the Obama Administration agree on major aspects of so-called health care reform.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldviewtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhovatican; bravosierra; catholic; globalism; newworldorder; nobelprize; obamacare; religiousleft; vatican; vaticanliberalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 381 next last
To: Quix
"I just realized, the whine is about the letters "R.C.'s!"

I accept your confession and your apology.

201 posted on 10/14/2009 12:47:14 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
On Merriam Webster’s online dictionary, RC means either Red Cross, resistance-capacitance or Roman Catholic.

Searching acronymfinder.com and Googling “define: RC” yields more acronyms, but none of them insulting that I can see.

The urbandictionary.com has many definitions, some obscene but none that I can see with the historical reference you claim. Then again all kinds of common words have obscene meanings on that website.

The online etymology dictionary sheds no light on the issue. It is usually helpful when the use of term has changed over the years, e.g. awful.

If you can establish with source links that the abbreviation RC is a slur or reference to potty language in modern usage then do so.

If not, grow some skin or leave the thread.

202 posted on 10/14/2009 12:47:57 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Quix

You need to drop the subject, too, to not pick at the scab and/or make this thread “about” individual Freepers.


203 posted on 10/14/2009 12:49:39 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; Gamecock

I see some have long term apartments in Alice’s rabbit hole.

I have less than 0.0000000000000000000000% need to ask you to be in charge of my dictionary.

I have less than 0.0000000000000000000000% need to allow you to be in charge of my dictionary.

I realize that RELIGIONISTS of many stripes and certain personalities are such outrageous CONTROL FREAKS that they compulsively DEMAND to be in charge of everyone’s dictionaries.

However, around these parts, we are more used to that being the SOP of OThuga and camp.

I realize a lot of Roman Catholics think CHOICE is a wonderful new word . . . along with PROGRESSIVE and the like.

Normally, on FR, we do not.


204 posted on 10/14/2009 12:49:56 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

None offered.


205 posted on 10/14/2009 12:50:50 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

AYE AYE.

No problem

Thanks.

I’d have shut up long ago . . . just didn’t want to leave the impression . . . welll anyway. Thanks.


206 posted on 10/14/2009 12:52:13 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I concur.

Not just Roman Catholic, but Discip;es of Christ, United Methodist, most Presbyterians, Lutherans, and a few others have thrown God’s word in the can on this.


207 posted on 10/14/2009 12:54:21 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

Which diocease is Billy-Bob’s?


208 posted on 10/14/2009 12:57:55 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Of course you’ve never been into a liquor store, so you wouldn’t have any theories on that, right?


209 posted on 10/14/2009 1:01:26 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

So he was definitely proposing a kingdom of man, rather than a Kingdom of Christ?


210 posted on 10/14/2009 1:04:41 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Barack Hussein Obama: the country's greatest firearms salesman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
"If you can establish with source links that the abbreviation RC is a slur or reference to potty language in modern usage then do so."

OK, you are obviously not Catholic and haven't spent any time in the poor Catholic sections of the UK and Ireland, but have established the level of proof as being online resources. I will act and post accordingly.

211 posted on 10/14/2009 1:06:59 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
"This post seems to be far more about me than about Vatican Doctrine."

You seem to be working awfully hard to make it that way.

Quite the flame baitor, aren't you!

212 posted on 10/14/2009 1:07:25 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

Comment #213 Removed by Moderator

To: vladimir998
There is a distributist movement in America. It’s small, but it exists

True, but it is small and it will get nowhere. The condemnations of capitalism and social Darwinism by movements associated with atheism and immorality have created a Pavlovian response in American conservatives. Consequently many of even the most religious conservatives place "small, limited government" at the apex of their political values.

I suppose this Pavlovian conditioning might explain why certain religious people react negatively to conservatives' battles against immorality--morality has become "social Darwinism" to them.

214 posted on 10/14/2009 1:09:08 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Bere'shit bara' 'Eloqim 'et hashamayim ve'et ha'aretz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
"Quite the flame baitor, aren't you!"

Et tu? Reading minds and attributing motives are forms of “making it personal.”

215 posted on 10/14/2009 1:11:26 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Cue the One World Religion, to accompany that certain figure from Eastern Europe who will usher in the Tribulation (if that prophecy is actually destined to come true).


216 posted on 10/14/2009 1:11:44 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Barack Hussein Obama: the country's greatest firearms salesman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
"Reading minds..."

No, reading the plain words of your post.

217 posted on 10/14/2009 1:13:11 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; editor-surveyor
A statement is not reading the mind of another Freeper personally if it is coached as a question. It is expressing the mind of the one asking.

For instance, if I said "Do you misunderstand this?" or "Do you intend to condemn that Saint?" or "Are you trying to start a flame war?" - none would be "making it personal."

On the other hand, if I had said "You don't understand" or "You are condemning that Saint" or "You want to start a flame war" it would be reading your mind and therefore "making it personal."

218 posted on 10/14/2009 1:22:33 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

“coached” should have been “couched.”


219 posted on 10/14/2009 1:23:30 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Understood. Thank you.


220 posted on 10/14/2009 1:26:02 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 381 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson