Vatican Backs Obama's Global Agenda

ChristianWorldviewNetwork.com ^ | October 13, 2009 | Cliff Kincaid

[Alex Murphy]

....I’d say that anyone who claims that _Caritas_ is non-political or that it doesn’t take a POSITIVE interest in a Roman Catholic-based “development” of globalism is someone who has not read the encyclical, or someone who is not able to read it with comprehension, or is purposefully lying.

An excellent summation, Poe. And for the record, I've read the encyclical.

[Lorica]

Thank God there are traditional Catholic chapels and churches throughout the United States, Canada and the world. They believe that everything that happened in the church subsequent to Vatican II was heresy. More and more and coming to the conclusion that is exactly what the Vatican and the Pope represents.

Are you a sedevacantist?

[Petronski]

...as you so inappropriately termed me...

I referred to you specifically in that way in my post?

My advice to you is simple: read it again!

[Petronski]

...someone who has not read the encyclical, or someone who is not able to read it with comprehension, or is purposefully lying.

So in your opinion, those who disagree with you on this point are ignorant, stupid or lying.

LOL . . . Riiiiight.

[Petronski]

They believe that everything that happened in the church subsequent to Vatican II was heresy.

Do you include yourself in this group? Does this describe your beliefs?

[Quix]

INDEED.

THANKS TONS.

One begins to think that some folks are reading the encyclical printed on hemp.

[Quix]

but but but

but but but

if if if

therefore therefore therefore

except when except when except when

extenuating this’s

extenuating that’s

compassion for this compassion for that

temporal power

ecclesiastical power

pontifical power

blathering power

. . .

. . .

. . .

Actually, the Pope doesn’t have the kind of ecclesiastical power he’s asserted to have. That train left the station a long time ago if he ever had it from the beginning of 300-400 AD. I think the train left the station long before the first Pope around then.

Shoot the train has left the station in most Pentecostal/Charismatic churches. And those are the only places or agencies I’ve ever

OBSERVED AND EXPERIENCED THE MANIFEST PRESENCE AND POWER OF GOD.

The rest are, at best, good blatherers.

[Quix]

PRAISE GOD FOR THINKING, PERCEPTIVE ROMAN CATHOLICS.

GOD BE WITH YOU.

[Quix]

To be in difficulty with our government is one thing, but to have to wade through a document issued by the head of my Church and larded with newspeak is quite another.

---

Actually, kind of makes my skin crawl.

[Quix]

INDEED.

[IbJensen]

I believe the old adage “throwing out the baby with the bathwater” fits what Vatican II wrought.

[Quix]

In

la la land

works.

[Petronski]

What an odd detail to leave out of your Catholic credentials as listed in 119.

[Petronski]

For the three of you?

What a revealing admission.

[IbJensen]

I kept hoping that John Paul's replacement would address the numerous errors inherent in Vatican II, but I was wrong.

I believe that those popes succeeding Pius XII will owe their maker an explanation as to why they let the opportunity first to never hold such a schismatic gathering in the first place and then, failing that, continuing the heresies.

I believe by definition and taking into consideration what' happened to the Roman Catholic Church subsequent to that infamous event I am a sedevacantist.

Unfortunately, today, awaiting a reversal in the inherent errors of Vatican II there are a lot of sedevacantists. Fortunately, many of them are properly ordained priests.

[IbJensen]

No more odd that your confusing post to me.

[Quix]

Ahhhhhhhhh not managing Martin Buber very well this morning, I see.

[Quix]

One learns to never expect clarity out of a muddy pool in the barnyard.

[Petronski]

Once again you describe yourself quite aptly.

[Petronski]

No more odd that your confusing post to me.

Perhaps you were confused, but the post itself is not inherently confusing.