Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
What do you need a prophet for? I understand why the early church needed them, and in the sense of a proclaimer of God’s word, we need them now.

These are the Gifts of the Spirit. We ALL need them. These are true offices of the Church. If they are not in evidence, then the Spirit is not in evidence.

That is why I mentioned ‘1st Apostles, 2nd Prophets, 3rd Teachers’...the Apostles were undoubtedly first in the church’s need. Then prophets, since the NT wasn’t written. And then teachers...

So, it is your contention that certain of the gifts have passed away? Then why is it that the reader is encouraged to attain the "higher" gifts, if they no longer apply?

If one reads further in I Corinthians (as I had mentioned before), it provides for structures regarding how the gifts are to be applied within a congregation, especially prophecy... I Corinthians 13:2 obliquely refers to the highest prophetic kind - a prophet who speaks to nations (mountains)... And in the process defines the work of a prophet:

1Co 13:2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.

Now, in the sense of gifts, I don’t doubt some still are given prophecies. As I’ve mentioned before, in my experience, it is usually someone known for their close walk with God who brings up concerns involving purchases, someone’s motives, etc.

That is called a "word of knowledge" in some circles, which is a good thing - but it is a far cry from that described above.

Where are YOUR prophets? Did Isaiah operate in secret? Did Elijah act in private? Where are YOURS?

Who do YOU believe is currently a Prophet of God, ministering to the world today?

I have met some few, regionally... five that I consider to be prophets- Folks you have never heard of, who serve in their capacity. One of rare authority. Another handful which are unproven, but seem worthy.

All are wanderers, reclusive, or in small Church bodies, which seems to be somewhat of a stereotype in my observation, though that may not be typical, as much as some bias on my part (I tend to find solace in such places).

457 posted on 10/15/2009 5:58:33 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies ]


To: roamer_1

Lets look at 1 Cor 14 - maybe we’ll notice what it is that Paul describes as prophecy:

“3On the other hand, the one who prophesies speaks to people for their upbuilding and encouragement and consolation. 4The one who speaks in a tongue builds up himself, but the one who prophesies builds up the church. 5Now I want you all to speak in tongues, but even more to prophesy. The one who prophesies is greater than the one who speaks in tongues, unless someone interprets, so that the church may be built up.”

“18 I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you. 19 Nevertheless, in church I would rather speak five words with my mind in order to instruct others, than ten thousand words in a tongue...22 Thus tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is a sign not for unbelievers but for believers. 23 If, therefore, the whole church comes together and all speak in tongues, and outsiders or unbelievers enter, will they not say that you are out of your minds? 24But if all prophesy, and an unbeliever or outsider enters, he is convicted by all, he is called to account by all, 25 the secrets of his heart are disclosed, and so, falling on his face, he will worship God and declare that God is really among you.”

“29Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said. 30If a revelation is made to another sitting there, let the first be silent. 31For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all be encouraged, 32and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets. 33For God is not a God of confusion but of peace.”

I notice a few things:

There are probably 3-4 prophets per congregation, and possibly more - after all, if one lets 2-3 speak, and other weigh what is said, then the minimum would be 3-4. Per congregation.

You say you’ve met “five that I consider to be prophets” - that is about the MINIMUM per congregation, if Paul is using the same definition as you!

I notice that a prophet “speaks to people for their upbuilding and encouragement and consolation.” Hmmm...didn’t say much about predicting the future, did it. And who in the church “speaks to people for their upbuilding and encouragement and consolation” - any ideas?

While contrasting prophesy and tongues, Paul says, “in church I would rather speak five words with my mind in order to instruct others, than ten thousand words in a tongue”. So a prophet speaks words “with [his] mind in order to instruct others”.

Golly. I wonder if anyone in those stodgy old mainline Baptist churches ever does that...if so, who?

And I notice “But if all prophesy, and an unbeliever or outsider enters, he is convicted by all, he is called to account by all, the secrets of his heart are disclosed, and so, falling on his face, he will worship God and declare that God is really among you” - lets see, have I ever seen that?

Yep. Maybe not falling on his face, but certainly falling on his knees! And not once, but quite a few times!

Now, if you are right in defining what the office of a prophet is in the NT, then you have, by your own admission, met just enough in your life to support ONE congregation.

If I am right, and this office describes preaching the word of God, then I’ve seen this many times.

I have already said that the NT also supports a prophet who speaks the word of God directly. Anyone want to guess how many New Testaments were floating around in 75 AD? But most of the NT scriptures WERE available by 150-200 AD, which is also when the more formally defined prophets started to disappear.

By 100AD, the formal definition type Apostles were gone. Then, by 200 AD, certainly the large majority of the formal definition prophets were gone. Teachers remained, as did Preachers of the Word.

Of course, if you are right, then you have enough folks wandering around in secret to support a single congregation in one meeting. If I’m right, the church is doing OK by the gifts of the Spirit, who I believe has been at work for 2000 years - and yes, Baptist though I be, who worked through the Catholic and Orthodox Churches as well.

We still have church planters. We still have folks who, by your definition, have ‘knowledge’. But no, I see no sign we have second-grade Apostles who can do everything but write scripture. And I see no sign we have 4-5 future-telling prophets per congregation.

And I REALLY see no sign that Jedediah is a true prophet of God!


458 posted on 10/15/2009 6:31:39 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]

To: roamer_1

I certainly have similar experience and perspective.


460 posted on 10/15/2009 6:52:59 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson