Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Moltke
It simply doesn't get any dumber than that. An epic example of non sequitur (On par for that crowd, though.) Just because non-consensual sex may (or may not - who knows?) have played a role in evolution, it does not follow therefrom that 'rape' is condoned today by someone believing in the theory of evolution. (Otherwise, 95+ percent of males out there would be active rapists.)

Thankfully, atheist evolutionists are not all permitted to act according to their baser instincts. But there is nothing stopping them, other than external pressure to conform to a society whose laws were constructed before the age of self-identified atheists run amok.

After all, an evolutionist is a suit is still just a higher order of slime.

24 posted on 10/10/2009 4:56:39 PM PDT by topcat54 ("Don't whine to me. It's all Darby's fault.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: topcat54

I wonder why nobody thought to ask the Whoop-di-doodoo if she would think the same way if her daughter or grandaughter were raped. Would she be cool with that? What about if she herself was raped? Jus’ wonderin’....


26 posted on 10/10/2009 5:55:25 PM PDT by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson