Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr
All of which were addressed in my post.

Hardly! NONE of which was addressed in your post!

112 posted on 09/25/2009 5:01:19 AM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: tpanther
Hardly, the problem is the NEA secular humanists that demand young children understand that there’s “no place for God in the science class”, indeed in ANY class; nevermind the vast majority of children that attend school know better, freely accept Him in every other single facet of their lives, discuss Him openly in conversations, etc. etc. etc.
"Teach basic epistemology, avoid category errors, and do make kids choose between religion and science."

liberal lunatics like Micahel Newdow dependent on courts and liberal activist judges to enforce their liberal view of “science” and ideology… Evolution as it is currently taught in public school is anti-theistic and intolerant of dissent. Just an extension of abiogenesis...without intelligence, without design, above all without God...all by sheer chance, and children are taught they’re little more than great apes.

"The problem is with evolution being used to infer religion. It's no help to use religion to derive science."

168 posted on 09/25/2009 12:49:07 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: tpanther
Sorry, same typo. Should be:
"Teach basic epistemology, avoid category errors, and do NOT make kids choose between religion and science."

171 posted on 09/25/2009 12:50:40 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson