Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Calvin’s Worst Heresy: That Christ Suffered in Hell
Called to Communion ^ | September 15, 2009 | Taylor Marshall

Posted on 09/21/2009 10:14:12 AM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 701-713 next last
To: Alex Murphy

Who the hell cares what this Cardinal says......we DON’T WORSHIP MARY...PERIOD....END of ARGUMENT.


61 posted on 09/21/2009 12:56:04 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

You beat me to it. See my post 60...

Regarding your comments on Hell, there was a very interesting thread on this a few months ago:
HELL: Eternal Torment or Complete Annihilation?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2240648/posts

A VERY compelling argument for annihilation is made there.


62 posted on 09/21/2009 12:57:56 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Thanks.


63 posted on 09/21/2009 12:57:57 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

I was on a discussion here with some guys who claimed to be Catholic that said they believed that the bible teaches that Mary, in essence, died a virgin. My wife, who was Catholic for decades, never heard such a thing. Her take is that Mary was a Virgin until the birth of Christ.


64 posted on 09/21/2009 12:59:50 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
It seems that admonition must of necessity be included in threads that address any aspect of Catholicism. Perhaps we all should simply make it our tagline. It would save time and bandwidth.
65 posted on 09/21/2009 1:02:20 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

Yes an yes.


66 posted on 09/21/2009 1:03:41 PM PDT by delacoert (Good health to your belly button.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911; Dr. Eckleburg; Frumanchu
from the denomination that brings us Mary the co-redeemer..........pffffft

Surely you know the old canard..."the Catholic Church is not a 'denomination'." What you may not know is that if one accepts the claim that there are 33,000 Protestant denominations, one must also accept that there are "242 Catholic denominations", as both claims are made within and by the same source.

It bears calling out that, according to the only source they can cite, the "33,000" number makes no mention of "Protestants" or even "denominations", but rather is the number of all "Christian" organizations, including Catholic organizations. So if Catholics are going to claim there are 33,000 "Protestant denominations", make sure you hold them accountable for their own 242 separate Catholic denominations. That is, if you decide to trust the source at all, which I wouldn't recommend.

67 posted on 09/21/2009 1:05:24 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (...We never faced anything like this...we only fought humans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Yes and yes.


68 posted on 09/21/2009 1:05:41 PM PDT by delacoert (Good health to your belly button.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: missnry

Wow...thanks for hooking me up with that.


69 posted on 09/21/2009 1:16:00 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

“Jesus descended into Hades, but not Hell.

And what is the difference?

Act 2:27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.

Act 2:31He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.

Rev 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

Rev 20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.


70 posted on 09/21/2009 1:18:48 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Ann Archy
The worship of the Saints is an act of veneration (dulia), not of adoration (latria), which can be given only to God.

This sentence ought to convince you, Alex, that the English word "worship" carves out a wider semantic space than that that is properly differentiated between dulia and latria. In previous ages, bishops were called "Your Worship", and I don't think they were deified.

I've made this point many times, but I think Protestant-minded folks have a hard time accepting the latria/dulia distinction because of the theological de-emphasizing of Christian "sacrifice" as ONLY a sacrifice of prayer and devotion. Thus they see no practical difference between what Mary gets and what God gets.

HOWEVER, to the Catholic there is a huge--nay, infinite--gulf between what we offer Mary and what we offer God. The highest form of our sacrifice is not mere devotion but the Mass, and it is ALWAYS offered to God. Never to a saint, never to an angel, never to Mary. Read the text of any liturgy you like--even the ones specifically in honor of our Lady. You'll see that's invariably the case.

71 posted on 09/21/2009 1:27:07 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Nikas777
Clearly, you do not know. He was not praying in this case. He was reciting prophetic scripture. He was saying he has carried out the prophesy.

I concur with the latter statement, but not the former. Now, was he forsaken? He cried out that he was...do we believe His words on the cross? I think we do.

72 posted on 09/21/2009 1:28:00 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
God the Father does not force, He draws: "No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him" John 6:44 and "And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father" John 6:65

Where in either verse does it say God hasn't attempted to draw every man? It says no man can come to the Jesus unless the Father draws him, but it says nothing about the number of people the Father is drawing. It could be 1%, 5%, or 100%. The verse is MUTE about the actual number. Trying to say these verses argue a percentage (less than 100% or 100%) is reading something into the verses they don't say. The verses are mute about the actual percentage of men God is drawing. Mute.

Oh, and you ignored Jesus's words to the Pharisees and my question. How did the Pharisees sins jump back onto him if Christ paid for every-ones sins on the cross?

I'm not arguing universal salvation. I'm saying Christ's sacrifice was big enough to cover everyone's sin (not that it automaticly did.) Christ's sacrifice was big enough to cover 1,000 times every sin in history and then some.

Say I went to traffic court and gave the judge one million dollars and said "This is to cover the fines of everyone in here, but only if they ask for it, if they don't ask for it, don't use it to pay their fine." Will all their fines be paid? No, only the fines of those that ask for it. If someone comes up and says "I don't want your money, I'll pay my own fine" then that is exactly what will happen. They will pay their own fine (even though there is more than enough money available to pay their fine, IF they would accept it.)

And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all [men] unto me. - John 12:32

All is pretty inclusive. It means every single one. Notice though, it doesn't say "save all", it says "draw all". Jesus here is clearly saying all men will be "drawn" to him. It does not say they will respond positivly to being drawn.

From there verses you posted, we know it is the Father that draws men to Jesus. Those verses don't say how many men the Father will draw to Jesus (10%, 50%, 100%, the verses are mute about the number.) Jesus himself tells us how many: "all".

None of this supports universal salvation, and if you think it does you are reading something into it that isn't there. The words "draw" does not equal "save". They have different meanings.

73 posted on 09/21/2009 1:30:59 PM PDT by Brookhaven (http://theconservativehand.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88

Ouch...awesome reply. Thanks!


74 posted on 09/21/2009 1:35:27 PM PDT by boatbums (Not everything faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed unless it is faced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: trisham; Ann Archy; NYer

Why is it that anytime one of Protestantism’s heresies is exposed the anti-Catholics immediately shift the focus to the Blessed Virgin Mary?


75 posted on 09/21/2009 1:42:44 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88
No question not everything Calvin said was infallible. He just did such a great job dismantling that bodacious monstrosity of demonic Catholic error.

Now hang on there my friend. If he wasn't infallible, then what assurance do you have he didn't insert his own bodacious monstrosities of error in place of whatever alleged ones came from Rome?

Or is he only fallible when you DISAGREE with him?

76 posted on 09/21/2009 1:44:43 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy; Ann Archy
I was on a discussion here with some guys who claimed to be Catholic that said they believed that the bible teaches that Mary, in essence, died a virgin.

NOBODY believed otherwise until well into the Reformation. I will acknowledge that there was some debate about her Immaculate Conception even before the Reformation, but there was no debate about her perpetual virginity.

Luther, Calvin, Swingli, and others ALL believed that the Blessed Mother was ever virgin.

There is NOTHING in the Bible to suggest that she had other children and our Lord's words to the Apostle John on the Cross clearly suggest that she had no other children.

77 posted on 09/21/2009 1:48:44 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Christ did not consider himself forsaken nor was he pleading or begging for his life. He was reciting scripture on the cross. He was educating. He was holding court. He was providing his last sermon.


78 posted on 09/21/2009 1:50:16 PM PDT by Nikas777 (En touto nika, "In this, be victorious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Marie2; Theo
In his book The Heidelberg Catechism: A Study Guide, OPC minister G. I. Williamson has written:

There is no phrase in the Apostles' Creed that has caused so much difficulty as this: 'He descended into hell.' Also, there is disagreement as to what the ancient church meant when it included these words in this earliest Christian confession. Yet in spite of the difficulty, the church has never been willing to remove these words.

How then shall we understand them? We cannot possibly take these words to mean that Christ, after he died, went to the place where lost men go to suffer forever. We know he did not go there because he told the believing thief who died at his side that he would be with him that very day in paradise (Luke 23:43).

The biblical meaning must be that what Christ suffered on the cross was itself a descent into hell. Now at first sight it might seem ridiculous to say that Jesus, in a few hours of suffering, could have experienced hell to the fullest. But remember, he was divine as well as human. Remember, too, that his human nature was sinless. Just imagine how great the suffering must have been for him when he was forsaken by God. Yes, because of the uniqueness of Jesus Christ, it was possible for him to suffer the full measure of the infinite wrath and curse of God—what damnation is for the wicked. And because he did, you and I can be sure that God's justice is fully satisfied, so that we shall escape that damnation. Here is the Christian's solid basis for hope.

79 posted on 09/21/2009 1:51:47 PM PDT by suzyjaruki (What is coming next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Marie2

Interesting. You believe God has picked who He has saved, and that not everyone can be saved?

Where is our choice in the matter?


80 posted on 09/21/2009 1:54:50 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 701-713 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson