[Diamond]

No evidence is required to dispute claims devoid of any evidence.

Exactly my point concerning your original implicit, presumptuous claim of universal knowledge. I'm not squirming, I merely hold you to your own standard. Thus, I am not required to dispute claims devoid of any evidence

The burden of proof is on you to falsify my claim.

See what Judge Land said to Orly Taitz about who has the burden of proof in an injuction, the Plaintiff or the Defendant. Same kinda deal here.

Cordially,

[LeGrande]

See what Judge Land said to Orly Taitz about who has the burden of proof in an injuction, the Plaintiff or the Defendant. Same kinda deal here.

You are confusing the laws of men with the laws of nature. There is no truth in the laws of men, everything is arbitrary.