[Diamond]

You are absolutely correct Diamond. I can't prove that there are no accurate fulfilled prophecies. Why don't you point out a clear, accurate, fulfilled prophecy? All it takes is one and you can prove me wrong : )

What sense would it make to provide evidence to an evidentialist who makes claims but who feels no burden to provide evidence to back up his own claims? You have already showed a reckless disregard for truth by making a fantastic claim, implicit in which is the presumption that you literally know-it-all, and now here you explicitly deny the same. As these unresovable contradictions are internal to your claim, I see nothing yet that meets a threshold of obligation to provide an evidentiary response.

Cordially,

[LeGrande]

What sense would it make to provide evidence to an evidentialist who makes claims but who feels no burden to provide evidence to back up his own claims?

No evidence is required to dispute claims devoid of any evidence.

You have already showed a reckless disregard for truth by making a fantastic claim, implicit in which is the presumption that you literally know-it-all, and now here you explicitly deny the same.

The burden of proof is on you to falsify my claim. Simply point out a clear, accurate, prophecy and you prove me wrong : )

As these unresovable contradictions are internal to your claim, I see nothing yet that meets a threshold of obligation to provide an evidentiary response.

'Unresolvable Contradictions'? That there are no accurate prophecies?

It is interesting watching you squirm, trying to avoid showing where the word of GOD is accurate and predictive : )