Well, you didn't address this to me, but let me ask you: By your open critique of somebody's religious expression on this thread, are you yourself then thereby engaging in an "attack" upon a religion?
And if you are, then why are you violating your own personal standard?
If you don't think you're attacking somebody's religious expression, it sure sounds like a disagreement -- a critique -- and so please explain the "degree" of difference you see between a so-called "attack" and critique? (One man's critique is another man's "attack", eh?)
Thank you for the time you have spent responding. I am thinking about this matter and the article. I expect that you do not mind posters responding to you at this point.
One of my initial reactions was that this topic of “Mormons & polygamy” looks like a ‘canard’. I expect many people would react like that, especially in the U.S. ... and the article was published for an Indian readership. I realize that there is much more to consider. When I have a free moment, I will study more of what you had to say.