Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to tell the cult group from the Church? Know the truth!
Christian Messenger (India's Evangelical Newspaper) ^ | Sept. 12, 2009 | Sheba Devaraj

Posted on 09/15/2009 8:21:31 AM PDT by Colofornian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last
To: NoRedTape
All of post #60 was quoted from HERE...............

 

All other truths are found HERE........................

 

God wasn't foolin' around when he said.........."beware of false prophets"......................

61 posted on 09/15/2009 12:32:53 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Is that before or after they happily take the gold dental work from third world poor to build a Marble and Gold temple the poor can't use...
62 posted on 09/15/2009 12:43:32 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (There's something socialist in the neighborhood, who ya gonna call? MITTBUSTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

“Amen! Jesus Christ is my Savior, too. (I’m LDS.)

If you are a Christian, come out from among them -
for what fellowship does light have with darkness?

2 Corinthians 6:14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? [NIV: Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?]

15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,

18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.


63 posted on 09/15/2009 12:44:18 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I watched Joel Osteen’s program the other night. It was very uplifting and spiritual. I like him a lot!

And doesn't he have amazing hair? ;)
64 posted on 09/15/2009 12:46:02 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape
YOUR LIFE AS A MORMON

Thats a lot of red tape to get to heaven NoRedTape!

65 posted on 09/15/2009 12:48:43 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Amen! Jesus Christ is my Savior, too. (I’m LDS.)

What is most reassuring (from my perspective) is that the Kingdom of God is not divided up into little heavenly housing developments like 'Catholic Castles', 'Baptist Bungalows', 'Episcopalian Executive Suites', 'Mormon Mansions', Presbyterian Prairies', etc., (sorry if I left anybody out) there are NO demoninatations in Heaven, the only category of resident is "Washed in the Blood of the Lamb", and that's exactly the way it ought to be.

God Bless You.
66 posted on 09/15/2009 12:52:12 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB
I'm still not convinced.....most farmers I know only have one bull and bunches of cows.

Their cows won't get more or less pregnant by having only one bull, but a farmer only has to feed one bull - the rest are steaks in his freezer. It's a matter of economics not reproduction.

67 posted on 09/15/2009 12:53:45 PM PDT by colorcountry (A faith without truth is not true faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
'demoninatations' = 'denominations', lol - I must have been channeling Popeye, agh-agh-agh-agh.
68 posted on 09/15/2009 12:56:41 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Thank you. Mormons make bragging about their service a habit and it is a documented fact.

“Neither Boast of Faith Nor of Mighty Works”

“Charity Vaunteth Not Itself, Is Not Puffed Up”

69 posted on 09/15/2009 12:57:06 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Obama, the cow patty version of Midas. Everything he says is bull, everything he touches is crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; Saundra Duffy
What is most reassuring (from my perspective) is that the Kingdom of God is not divided up into little heavenly housing developments like 'Catholic Castles', 'Baptist Bungalows', 'Episcopalian Executive Suites', 'Mormon Mansions', Presbyterian Prairies', etc., (sorry if I left anybody out) there are NO demoninatations in Heaven,

Really? You haven't heard of the Mormon-only mansions is heaven? They call it the Celestial Kingdom - and if you're not Mormon, you're not going there, period.

Isn't that right, Sandy?

70 posted on 09/15/2009 12:59:16 PM PDT by colorcountry (A faith without truth is not true faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy; Godzilla
It has been a hundred years since plural marriage was practiced by Mormons.

Inaccurate. In error. Mistaken. You're trying to tell all of us that no Mormon polygamous union was practiced in the 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s? What? Do you think when Woodruff hit the brakes on polygamy in 1890, that all these poly-philanderers just tossed their extra "household labor unions" out on the streets?

(Not on your life).

So even on plural unions taking place among say, a man in his mid-20s in early 1890, that man was still 75 years old in 1940. Now, when you add to the facts that B. Carmon Hardy, in his 1992 book Solemn Covenant: The Mormon Polygamous Passage, placed an appendix of about 220 plural unions that secretly took place between 1890-1910, and you see that he has names, dates, marriage dates & death dates, there's some 3-way mainstream Mormon plural unions who were still alive in the early 1960s.

Go ahead & talk to Mormons -- & they'll tell you they knew of such families still around in the '50s & early 60s.

This doesn't even take into consideration the Mormon "cousins" -- the fLDS -- which has practiced polygamy to current times.

71 posted on 09/15/2009 1:01:57 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; mkjessup; Saundra Duffy
You haven't heard of the Mormon-only mansions is heaven? They call it the Celestial Kingdom - and if you're not Mormon, you're not going there, period.

Yeah, I call it Kolob Heights. (Only is only "high" in terms of how far the fall is -- see Isaiah 14:12 and following)

72 posted on 09/15/2009 1:05:10 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy; Godzilla; All
From the article: “Mormonism and polygamy go hand in hand“

What nonsense! This is 2009 last time I checked.

OK, let's look at the 20th & 21st century calendar, + what I'll call "Mormon 'time'."

1900-1910: About 100 Lds plural unions secretly solemnized by Lds official leaders ... often in Mexico, where it was illegal there too (they just didn't have to worry about enforcement issues there).

1910-early 1960s: Additional plural unions almost ground to a halt between 1910 and early 1940s...when the fLDS emerged and since the Mormons never did away with D&C 132 -- 'twas still on the official "scripture" books & was still canon -- whose fault was the fLDS Mormon breakaway?

Why 'twas the mainstream Mormons! The fLDS were just being faithful, loyal "retro" 19th century traditional Mormons!!! ['Tis like an elderly wife complaining, as she sits close to the older-model pick-ups' passenger window, about how they don't cuddle anymore as a couple, and the husband-driver asks, "Well, who moved?"]

Early-to-mid 1960s:
#1 The final mainstream Mormon earthly polygamous unions die out...but the spirit of mainstream Mormon polygamy was still "alive and well" on planet earth because...
#2 1963: A survey says 40% of Mormons said they would pick up the polygamy bandwagon where it left off if their "prophet" told them to...
#3 1966: Lds apostle Bruce McConkie publishes a book called "Mormon Doctrine" (revision book under the closely supervised eye of Spencer W. Kimball, future Lds "prophet" who was assigned to be such a mentoring watchdog to McConkie by then LDS "prophet" Harold B. Lee). What did McConkie, holding a position that Lds leaders say is interchangeable with the "prophet," say?
"Obviously the holy practice (of polygamy) will commence again after the Second Coming of the Son of Man and the ushering in of the millennium." (LDS apostle Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 1966 edition, see pp. 577-579 for context)

2009-?: Well, obviously, Jesus could return at any time. So, for all we know, per apostle McConkie, Mormon polygamy could be re-established Sept. 15, 2009!

As for "Mormon time" I'm referencing the "non-years" of what Lds call the "celestial kingdom" -- the supposed place where Mormon god-spirits die after living on earth. This, supposedly, is a parallel universe -- existing right now -- for eternity -- where supposed marriages are forever. Therefore, the statement, Saundra, you're complaining about, is a true statement IF Lds polygamy is eternal.

Questions for you, Saundra:
Are 19th & 20th century "good" Mormon polygamists still polygamists on the other side of the veil?
Are 19th, 20th, & 21st century Mormon earthly monogamists -- who serially married multiple spouses for eternity -- likewise eternal polygamists?
And isn't that true of women as well as men -- Lds official policy is that some women will have multiple husbands for eternity?

73 posted on 09/15/2009 1:28:46 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla
Anybody who can swallow this, can swallow anything:

Joseph Smith holds the keys of this last dispensation, and is now engaged behind the vail in the great work of the last days.

I can tell our beloved brother Christians who have slain the Prophets and butchered and otherwise caused the death of thousands of Latter-day Saints, the priests who have thanked God in their prayers and thanksgiving from the pulpit that we have been plundered, driven, and slain, and the deacons under the pulpit, and their brethren and sisters in their closets, who have thanked God, thinking that the Latter-day Saints were wasted away, something that no doubt will mortify them—something that, to say the least, is a matter of deep regret to them—namely, that no man or woman in this dispensation will ever enter into the celestial kingdom of God without the consent of Joseph Smith.

Brigham Young, October 9, 1859

Journal of Discourses, Vol. 7, p.289.

74 posted on 09/15/2009 1:41:18 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
I watched Joel Osteen on Larry King, (The only reason I watched King at all), I learned all I need to know about Osteen when he told King he "could not say there is only one way to get to Heaven".
75 posted on 09/15/2009 1:45:15 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

Cows ???

Yeppers thats what one of the early mormon leaders called women...

“I think no more of getting another wife than I do of buying anoher cow...”

Does God say that ???


76 posted on 09/15/2009 1:50:57 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
What is most reassuring (from my perspective) is that the Kingdom of God is not divided up into little heavenly housing developments like 'Catholic Castles', 'Baptist Bungalows', 'Episcopalian Executive Suites', 'Mormon Mansions', Presbyterian Prairies', etc., (sorry if I left anybody out) there are NO demoninatations in Heaven, the only category of resident is "Washed in the Blood of the Lamb", and that's exactly the way it ought to be.

Yes and no. There's no strict denominational correlation earth to heaven. You'll find. Presbyterians. You'll find ex-Presbyterians. You'll find ex-Mormons. Etc.

But the Bible talks about many dividing lines in different word pictures applied to different groups of people. We know, for example, that Matthew 25 says the "goats" won't get in. Now just because "goats" isn't a current "denomination" doesn't mean we don't have goat-like sects.

What we DO see from Scripture is that God judges peoples BOTH individually -- and corporately. Jesus judged entire towns when visibly present on earth. He also judged entire geographical churches in Rev 2 & 3.

A key dividing line Jesus makes, referencing twice, is Did He Know us? Was He in a communicative, vibrant, living forgiveness-based relationship with us? Were there too many false intermediaries & 'prophets' between us -- blocking Him out?

A second key dividing line Jesus makes is in John 17:3: "And this is eternal life, that you know the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom He has sent."

That relationship then has to be two-way -- Do we KNOW THE ONLY true God -- or is it a deeply false characterization of Him? [Quick quiz: Do you think other real gods exist? If so, you don't know "THE ONLY true God" per John 17:3]

For example, you could think you know someone very well in an online relationship -- but it can turn out you didn't know that person at all. You had illusions. You had false impressions. You had misguided understandings based upon what your friends & family members told you about this person.

If we think God is only or primarily a strong stern lawgiver, precept-keeper, ordinance regulator, commandment-keeper, temple recommend checklist keeper and know little of His grace, mercy, and compassion, we will respond to Him much differently than if we had a more balanced perspective. And that can have eternal consequences.

77 posted on 09/15/2009 1:51:03 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
"Joseph Smith holds the keys of this last dispensation, and is now engaged behind the vail in the great work of the last days."

To bad 'ol Joe didn't have the keys to the Carthage Jail. Instead, the poor schmuck was shot while trying to escape.

The Egyptians sure had a good laugh at 'ol Joe's translations, though. Laughter is good for the soul.

78 posted on 09/15/2009 1:54:22 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape
You will be expected to donate at least ten percent of your income to the church as tithing. Other donations will be expected as the need arises. You will never see an accounting of how this money is spent, or how much the church receives, or anything at all about its financial condition; the church keeps its finances secret, even from its members.

WOW! My little church puts out a detailed statement every month showing what was taken in and what it was spent on, how much is left over etc. I mean every single detail.

79 posted on 09/15/2009 1:55:08 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy; Colofornian

“Mormonism and polygamy go hand in hand “
_____________________________________________

Yes, they do...

One of the main reasons that Joey Smith started his home made religion was for an excuse to cheat on Emma...

And SD, please refrain from cursing and taking the Name of my Lord, the God of the Bible in vain...


80 posted on 09/15/2009 1:55:17 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson