It’s not my argument. Ask whomever posted the snips from whatever anti Mormon site they got them from. Or read the whole thing. That’s your choice. I’m sure the intent of the purpose of out of context snips has been made clear.
I was wondering about the factual part of how Roberts gets from “Smith’s book is of a character and quantity to make a ground plan for the Book of Mormon” to “our faith is not only unshaken but unshakeable in the Book of Mormon.”
There would seem to be an explanation of the first statement required for the second. Perhaps not, perhaps Roberts doesn’t give one.
Is it just a “heads up” without an apologetic? I’m asking you because you seemed to have a dog in this hunt.
If you don’t know, that’s ok too, no problem. I’m just looking for information, not commenting on “intent of the purpose.”