Science (a gift from God) strongly suggests that stuff like that just doesn't happen.
Then again, you reject the New Testament in toto.
Exactly. If I accepted the "new testament," I'd accept all of it, not just the parts that don't offend "science." I'd have no quarrel with you if you'd disavow Genesis as scripture, but you attribute it to G-d and then insist it is full of historical and scientific errors.
BTW, your hypocrisy and inconsistency as to when you will listen to "science" and when you will not is what led that crazy guy in Minnesota to do what he did.
A claim that is doubly bizarre, since there are no parts that offend science and the "if" at the beginning is an insurmountable obstacle to your relevance.
...you attribute it to God and then insist it is full of historical and scientific errors...
Nope. It's got nothing to do with errors. It's about the wisdom to know what is literal and what is allegory.
BTW, your hypocrisy and inconsistency as to when you will listen to "science" and when you will not is what led that crazy guy in Minnesota to do what he did.
My hypocrisy did that?
That's claim is beneath you. I'll accept your apology.