[Petronski]

Your continued effort to couple your literal view of Genesis with Transubstantiation is bizarre, since the Catechism does not claim any “scientific inerrancy” of Transubstantiation.

Or do you have a paragraph number I might have overlooked?

[Zionist Conspirator]

Your continued effort to couple your literal view of Genesis with Transubstantiation is bizarre, since the Catechism does not claim any “scientific inerrancy” of Transubstantiation.

So there is no change then, and the "real presence" is symbolic (like Genesis).