[Petronski]

I repeat: I am not primarily an anti-evolutionist. I am primarily an exponent of the first eleven chapters Genesis being literal history. I reject any theology that does this, whether it is "evolutionary" or not.

Have you begun to gather that I don't care?

I was responding to refute the insinuation that believing in evolution means evolution happened without Divine interference.

[Zionist Conspirator]

I was responding to refute the insinuation that believing in evolution means evolution happened without Divine interference.

Of course one may believe that evolution happened with Divine "interference." But to do so one must reject the historical and scientific inerrancy of Genesis. So big whoop.