So what? Really?
Let's review.
Markbsnr said evolution is scientific fact and presented as evidence the plant experiment. You replied:
So you're saying that the fact that people got plants to evolve in a lab is scientific proof that everything in the universe evolved without any Divine "interference?"Believing in evolution does not mean everything in the universe evolved without any Divine "interference?"
Your question assumed a false dichotomy and I pointed it out. That's what.
Since you are such a fan of "science," I hope you reject transubstantiation, resurrection of the dead, the virgin birth and other such unscientific fairy tales.
Why? There's no inherent contradiction between science and any of those things, evolution included.
I repeat: I am not primarily an anti-evolutionist. I am primarily an exponent of the first eleven chapters Genesis being literal history. I reject any theology that does this, whether it is "evolutionary" or not.
Per example, Adam being created from `afar and Eve from his side as he slept are historical facts, not theological parables (though they are loaded with theological meaning). If you come up with some non-evolutionary origin story that denies this then you'll learn what my focus is.
Are you aware that your friend vladimir998 is doesn't seem to agree with you?