Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: TaxachusettsMan

I thought the mass was very nice, with the exception of the petitions read by the children. That was a political ad.

Other than that, I was OK with most of it.

Politically, really, O’Malley had to be there.


7 posted on 09/03/2009 7:12:56 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RexBeach

O’Malley exchanged truth for a lie by being there “politically”


10 posted on 09/03/2009 7:28:52 AM PDT by frogjerk (Obama Administration: Security thru Absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: RexBeach

“Politically, really, O’Malley had to be there.”

No, he didn’t. He chose to be there.

Militant


13 posted on 09/03/2009 7:33:01 AM PDT by militant2 (I may not agree with everything you say, but......hell, I don't agree with anything you say!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: RexBeach
Politically, really, O’Malley had to be there.

What is O'Malley campaigning for?
16 posted on 09/03/2009 7:37:29 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: RexBeach

I am afraid that waiting to bring comfort was too late. The Catholic church in Massachusetts did not shepherd Kennedy. They let him down and any other Catholic by their lukewarm attitude. It was not just about abortion, Kennedy supported abortion at any time, any way,plus taking money from the abortion industry. He also supported embryonic cell research which has nothing to offer when compared to adult stem cells. He supported gay marriage and cloning. All of these issue goes directly against the church and brings public scandal and minimizes the authority of the church. Kennedy made the way for the rest of the Catholic politicians to go against the church teaching and feel good about it. We as Christians cannot go about life thinking we can be one person in public profession advocating against the church and then somehow say we are Christians. Judgment will be on one person the whole person, politician and Catholic Christian. The church should have had moral courage and outrage on what Kennedy was supporting since he had so much political power when he was alive. Now they talk about comforting? Judgment is now, who is there to comfort Kennedy when he is now before the seat of justice and mercy? Then ask yourself what would John the Baptist have done with Kennedy? He would have challenged him just like Pilate, even at the lost of his life.


75 posted on 09/03/2009 9:33:40 AM PDT by red irish (Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson