Now that reason sounds more plausible to me than the theory SLIME is advocating.
I feel the two theories have more in common than not.
SLIME is purporting that the USCCB did not like Martino's attacks on politicians....not because they were untrue, but because they jeopardized donations.
Remember, the Church does not report its source of funding, but I bet the USCCB has a good handle on where it derives the money needed to operate the Church in the US.
Is it possible that the US wing of the Church has been bought by Democrats? The infiltration of the US Church by homosexuals is well-documented. Homosexuals are typically quite affluent.
Like Rush says----follow the money.