Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Irisshlass
If the incorrect information and unchristian comments posted in this thread are in any way indicative of the type of behavior at some of the town hall meetings then perhaps the democrats have a valid argument.
60 posted on 08/31/2009 2:05:01 PM PDT by VidMihi ("In fide, unitas; in dubiis, libertas; in omnibus, caritas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


I do not find the Roman Catholic view of transubstantiation repugnant. I don’t agree with it, however. I feel that Paul’s warning to the Corinthians was due to their turning the event into a drunken feast. Personally, I believe that this is a matter of conscience; if a person believes that the bread and wine are actually the Body and Blood of Christ, and that enables you to find a particular “holy” spot of remembrance of the atoning sacrifice of our Lord, then maybe that is best for him or her. Of course, I recognize that our Roman Catholic friends will dispute that based on the authority of the Bishop of Rome, but I don’t want to create a controversy for the sake of controversy.


61 posted on 08/31/2009 2:21:39 PM PDT by Arkansas Toothpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: VidMihi

What incorrect information and unchristian comments are you referring to?


62 posted on 08/31/2009 2:33:54 PM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson