Of course. What makes you think I would disagree?
You seem to have some argument with me, judging by the several recent posts, but I do not know what that argument is. If - I am venturing a guess — you think that because of the multiplicity of codices, the need for magisterium, and the error of private interpretation, the scripture is not inerrant (despite the magisterial teaching in the Providentissimus Deus encyclical), then I do not see how it follows.
***You seem to have some argument with me***
Not really. Mostly agreeing with your posts up to the point of the claim of inerrant Scripture. Scripture is not; the Church’s interpretation is.